Saturday, November 26, 2011

Mitt Romney's Immigration Stance Now Clear: Pressure Undocumented To Leave The Country

WASHINGTON -- Mitt Romney's evolution into a full-fledged immigration hawk is complete.

The Republican presidential candidate's comments this week on the issue of undocumented immigrants made clear where he stands now: The U.S. government should do nothing proactive beyond creating a hostile environment for those in the country illegally, in the hopes that they leave.

Anyone in the United States in violation of federal law should go back to his or her country of origin, Romney said Wednesday during a tele-town hall with Iowa voters.

The former Massachusetts governor noted that he favors a "path to citizenship" for undocumented immigrants, but added that "consists of going to their home country, applying for citizenship or permanent residency just like everybody else, and getting back in the line."

"They should have to get in the same line with everybody else who wants to come here legally," Romney said.

In 2007, Romney had also talked of undocumented immigrants returning to their country of origin, but back then he didn't appear to favor that approach for all. In the end, his comments in a key Dec. 16, 2007, interview on NBC's "Meet the Press" were jumbled and unclear.

"They should have a set period during which period they sign up for application for permanent residency or for citizenship. But there's a set period whereupon they should return home. And if they've been approved for citizenship or for a permanent residency, well, that would be a different matter. But for the great majority, they'll be going home," Romney told Tim Russert in that interview.

The Romney campaign did not answer questions about whether those comments constituted the view that some, but not all, undocumented immigrants should have to leave the country. The phrase "great majority" implies it is what he meant.

So in the past, Romney indicated an openness to creating a process by which undocumented immigrants might achieve permanent status in the U.S. But his position has hardened: He now believes the government should do nothing directly for those who are in the country without documentation and want to stay, regardless of whether they are productive members of society or are receiving government benefits or are involved in criminal enterprises.

He wants to direct immigrants' behavior through "incentives."

"People respond to incentives," Romney said during the Republican presidential debate Tuesday night. "And if you can become a permanent resident of the United States by coming here illegally, you'll do so."

An incentive approach mainly means making it so difficult for undocumented immigrants to be in the U.S. that they leave on their own, as Romney's top spokesman, Eric Fehrnstrom, explained to Philip Klein of the Washington Examiner after the debate Tuesday.

"No in-state tuition, no benefits of any kind, no employment. You put in place an employment verification system with penalties for employers that hire illegals, that will shut off access to the job market, and they will self-retreat. They will go to their countries," Fehrnstrom said.

Romney reiterated this position in the tele-town hall Wednesday: "So for me, the answer is pretty straightforward: fence, enough troops, an identification system that identifies who's here legally, and then tough sanctions for employers that hire people who are here illegally."

This answer would not actually address all undocumented immigrants. A good number would remain. But Romney has apparently decided that it is too dangerous to cross the conservative base of the Republican Party, which is vehemently against any form of normalization for undocumented immigrants.

Romney's shift on the issue first saw the light of day in the 2008 campaign, when he ran to the right of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) -- the party's eventual nominee -- on the immigration issue. Then, as with his attacks on Newt Gingrich now, Romney denounced McCain as favoring "amnesty."

During a Wednesday appearance in Iowa, Romney attacked Gingrich for his comments at the previous night's debate.

Gingrich's plan is to open a "path to legality" for some undocumented immigrants. "We need a path to legality, but not citizenship, for some of these individuals who have deep ties to America, including family, church and community ties," states his 10-point immigration plan.

As the former speaker of the House put it Tuesday night, "You get to be legal, but you don't get a pass to citizenship."

Gingrich added, "And so there's a way to ultimately end up with a country where there's no more illegality, but you haven't automatically given amnesty to anyone."

His plan would require securing the border, establishing a guest worker program, deporting those who are in the U.S. illegally and have committed crimes, and then creating what he likened Tuesday night to a "World War II Selective Service board" to review the cases of the undocumented.

A Gingrich spokesman explained Wednesday that "local citizen review boards" would review local cases of undocumented immigrants who want to stay in the country. "They could be judged by a jury of their neighbors," R.C. Hammond told the Des Moines Register.

But in Iowa on Wednesday, Romney said Gingrich had "offered a new doorway to amnesty."

"I know there's going to be great interest in finding how far we can apply amnesty, and I just think we make a mistake as a Republican Party to try to describe which people who come here illegally should be given amnesty, to be able to jump ahead of the line of people who have been waiting in line," Romney said in Des Moines. "My view is people who have waited in line patiently to come to this country legally should be ahead in line. And those who come here illegally should not be given a special deal or a special accelerated right to become a permanent resident or citizen."

Gingrich's 10-point plan says exactly the same thing. One of his three principles for immigration reform is this: "Under no circumstance can a path to citizenship be created which would allow those who have broken the law to receive precedence over those who patiently waited to become residents and citizens via the legal process. Those who adhered to our immigration law cannot be usurped by those who violated it."

Gingrich shot back at Romney on Twitter Wednesday, linking to a snippet of the 2007 "Meet the Press" interview in which Romney said, "Those people who had come here illegally and are in this country, the 12 million or so that are here illegally, should be able to sign up for permanent residency or citizenship."

"So what's your position on citizenship for illegals again? (I oppose it.)," Gingrich tweeted. He also linked to his 10-step plan. The Romney campaign has not released any immigration plan.

Even the tone of Romney's rhetoric on immigration is far different from what it was just a few years ago. In a 2005 interview with the Boston Globe, he said of undocumented immigrants, "These people contribute in many cases to our economy and to our society. In some cases, they do not. But that's a whole group we're going to have to determine how to deal with."

In that interview, Romney said he had not formulated a position on various immigration reform plans being debated, but proposals by then-President George W. Bush and Sen. McCain were "reasonable." Specifically, he said that McCain's plan was "quite different" from "amnesty."

"It's saying you could work your way into becoming a legal resident of the country by working here without taking benefits and then applying and then paying a fine," Romney noted.

In the 2007 "Meet the Press" interview, Russert read a quote from a Romney interview with the Lowell Sun. "I don't believe in rounding up 11 million people and forcing them at gunpoint from our country," Romney had told the Sun. "With these 11 million people, let's have them registered, know who they are. Those who've been arrested or convicted of crimes shouldn't be here. Those that are paying taxes and not taking government benefits should begin a process towards application for citizenship, as they would from their home country."

On "Meet the Press," Romney stood by that position, telling Russert that "those people who had come here illegally and are in this country -- the 12 million or so that are here illegally -- should be able to stay, sign up for permanent residency or citizenship, but they should not be given a special pathway, a special guarantee that all of them get to stay here for the rest of their lives merely by virtue of having come here illegally."

He then added the nebulous line about having "a great majority" of undocumented immigrants leave the country.

Amanda Terkel contributed to this report.

'; var coords = [-5, -72]; // display fb-bubble FloatingPrompt.embed(this, html, undefined, 'top', {fp_intersects:1, timeout_remove:2000,ignore_arrow: true, width:236, add_xy:coords, class_name: 'clear-overlay'}); });

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/23/mitt-romney-immigration-pressure-undocumented_n_1110704.html

pabst blue ribbon pabst blue ribbon mac miller omarion gabby gabby marcel the shell with shoes on

SPC Tanangachi Mfuni: The Plain-Clothed Service Members Among Us (Huffington post)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/166524973?client_source=feed&format=rss

texas a m cochlear implant navy football navy football 50/50 50/50 dreamhouse

Friday, November 25, 2011

Another Arab leader set to fall?

Yemeni President Ali Abdullah Saleh was in Saudi Arabia on Wednesday to sign a U.S.-backed power transfer deal mediated by Gulf Arab states to resolve the impoverished country's crisis, Yemen's state television reported.

Saleh has repeatedly promised to sign the Gulf-brokered agreement, only to change his mind every time.

Under the deal, Saleh would step down and transfer power to the vice president in exchange for immunity from prosecution.

"The president ... arrived this morning in Riyadh on a visit to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, following an invitation from the Saudi leadership, to attend the signing of the Gulf initiative and its operational mechanism," state news agency Saba said.

  1. Only on msnbc.com

    1. GOP rivals scrap over national security, foreign policy
    2. PVC pipes killing thousands of birds in Nevada
    3. Chinese activist Ai Weiwei answers reader questions
    4. As floods recede, Bangkok blame game begins
    5. US retirement out of reach, couple heads to Panama
    6. Office holiday parties 2011: Tamer, less booze
    7. Fishermen's tuna gets taken ? by the law

Saba said Saleh had received a telephone call from U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon Tuesday to thank him "for his efforts to extract Yemen out of the crisis in a peaceful way."

The report did not say when the deal would be signed. It said that along with Gulf Arab representatives who sponsored the agreement, European and American envoys would also attend the signing.

Slideshow: Yemen in the spotlight (on this page)

Saleh has clung to power despite an 8-month-old uprising, mass protests calling for his ouster and a June assassination attempt that left him badly wounded and forced him to travel to Saudi Arabia for more than three months of hospital treatment.

'All parties agreed'
But things appeared to be shifting on Tuesday, when the U.N. secretary-general's envoy to Yemen, Jamal bin Omar, said all parties had agreed on a plan that would have Saleh step down.

"All parties agreed today on the Gulf initiative and the implementation of its mechanism," bin Omar said after meetings with Yemen's vice president, Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi, in Sanaa.

Security in Yemen has unraveled amid the uprising against Saleh's 30-year reign.

The situation is particularly bad in the south, where al-Qaida militants ? from what is perhaps the world's most active branch of the terror network ? have taken control of entire towns, using the turmoil to strengthen their position.

Timeline: Yemen in turmoil (on this page)

The unarmed protesters have held their ground with remarkable resilience, flocking to the streets of Sanaa and other Yemeni cities and towns to demand reforms from the autocratic government and braving a violent crackdown by government forces that has killed hundreds.

But their uprising, inspired by other Arab revolts in the region that saw longtime rulers of Egypt and Tunisa go, has at times been hijacked by Yemen's two traditional powers ? the tribes and the military ? further deepening the country's turmoil.

Breakaway military units and tribal fighters have been battling in Sanaa with troops loyal to Saleh, in fighting that has escalated in recent months.

An impoverished nation of some 25 million people, Yemen is of strategic value to the United States and its Gulf Arab allies, particularly Saudi Arabia.

It sits close to the major Gulf oilfields and overlooks key shipping lanes in the Red and Arabian seas.

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45413404/ns/world_news-mideast_n_africa/

veterans day 2011 country music awards cnbc debate family circus spanier jorge posada walmart black friday ad

Women Fake Orgasm to Hang Onto Their Men (LiveScience.com)

Women who are unsure of their partner's fidelity are the most likely to fake orgasms, as well as engage in other behaviors designed to hang on to their man, a new study finds.

The research is the first to quantitatively link suspicions of infidelity to the likelihood of faking orgasm, said study researcher Farnaz Kaighobadi, a postdoctoral researcher at the HIV Center for Clinical and Behavioral Studies at Columbia University.

But suspicion of infidelity isn't the only reason women might pretend they're having an orgasm, Kaighobadi said.

"A lot of the time, women are using it just as a tool to strengthen their relationship," she told LiveScience. "Sometimes women could be pretending orgasm just to show love and care to their partner."

The study was based on surveys of women, most of them in college and all of them heterosexual.

Cheating hearts and faked orgasms

Research on the female orgasm is relatively rare, Kaighobadi said. Previous studies used open-ended questions about women's sexual behavior, she said, and about half of the respondents said they had faked orgasm at some point in their lives. (By comparison, about 25 percent of men reported faking an orgasm.)

"One particular reason that emerges from a lot of studies is 'to keep my partner interested in this relationship,' or 'to prevent him from defecting [from] the relationship or leaving the relationship for another woman,'" Kaighobadi said.

To see if those anecdotes had a widespread basis, Kaighobadi distributed surveys to 453 women, ranging in age from 18 to 46, who had been in relationships for at least six months. Most of the women were Florida college students in their early 20s.

The surveys collected information about the women's demographics, their relationship dynamics and their sexual behaviors, including whether they had ever faked an orgasm during their current relationship. The women also were asked whether their partners had ever cheated, and how likely their partners were to do so in the future.

Adaptive orgasms

About 54 percent of the women in the study reported they had faked an orgasm at some point in their relationship. This group also was found to harbor more suspicions about their partners' fidelity than were the women who said they hadn't faked any orgasms.

Kaighobadi said these women also were more likely to engage in what psychologists call "mate-guarding" behaviors. Such behaviors can range from simply dressing up nicely for one's partner to keeping tabs of where he goes and telling off other women who look at him.

"It seems that women who were more likely to pretend orgasm were also more likely to do a variety of these behaviors at the same time," Kaighobadi said.

The researchers didn't ask how satisfied the women were with their sexual relationships, Kaighobadi said, so it was unknown whether faking orgasm is related to lower levels of satisfaction in bed. [Why Women Shrug Off Lousy Sex]

The research, published in the November issue of the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior, could help inform an academic debate about whether the female orgasm is adaptive, meaning it somehow gives women an evolutionary advantage, Kaighobadi said. Researchers have argued over whether orgasms help a woman retain sperm from valued partners, and whether having orgasms keeps a male partner interested ? ?both of which would be considered adaptive functions.

"Only one or two studies provide evidence of whether there is an adaptive function or not," Kaighobadi said. "We're not sure, and I think there should be a lot more study."

You can follow LiveScience?senior writer Stephanie Pappas on Twitter @sipappas.?Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter @livescience?and on Facebook.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/science/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20111123/sc_livescience/womenfakeorgasmtohangontotheirmen

amanda palmer listeria monocytogenes chipper jones chipper jones jordan jefferson lauren alaina

Leaders sound pension alarm (San Jose Mercury News)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories Stories, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

Source: http://news.feedzilla.com/en_us/stories/politics/top-stories/165421145?client_source=feed&format=rss

tucson weather tucson weather peyton hillis cl p cl p andy rooney andy rooney

Thursday, November 24, 2011

Black Friday Blacklist

These steep discounts might have been a good offer a few months ago, given that Apple isn?t going to offer any major price breaks on the iPad (it starts at $499). But both Amazon and Barnes and Noble are now selling cheap tablets of their own, and their devices are more attractive than the also-runs you?ll find at Black Friday. It?s true that I didn?t love Amazon?s $199 Kindle Fire, but if you?ve absolutely got to have a cheap tablet this year, there?s no better one on the market. That?s because the Fire isn?t going to be discontinued tomorrow?Amazon will keep offering lots and lots of content for the device, and it will likely offer software upgrades that will fix some of the problems I had with it. This is true of the Nook Tablet, too, although at $250 plus tax, it?s not nearly as good of a deal as the Fire.

Source: http://feeds.slate.com/click.phdo?i=b740475ba42e970d67cf84067bea5abf

ed lee ed lee garmin nuvi 1450 amzn tommy john surgery colorado weather alcohol poisoning

Finding Legal Aids in New York | Free New York Blog

One of the growing trends throughout the country is providing free legal aid to persons who cannot afford adequate legal representation. When it comes to legal aids in New York, there are a number of different ways to locate attorneys who have chosen to provide legal assistance to persons who require the services of a lawyer, but whose current circumstances prevent them from being able to hire legal counsel.

One of the easiest places to look is in the yellow pages for your local telephone service provider. A number of attorneys will include in their information their affiliation with a legal aid program. By scanning through the section for attorneys and also looking under the heading of ?legal aid services? it is a safe bet that you will find several attorneys in the New York metro area that may be able to help.

A visit to the local courthouse may also yield some results. A number of the court houses in the New York metro area maintain listing of attorneys that are available to take on cases where the defendant does not have assets to use for payment. Many of these will also be affiliated with one free legal program or another. These legal aids in New York listings are free for the asking, so you may be able to find an attorney off this sort of list that would be right for you.

Checking with friends may also be a good way to find several legal aids in New York. Perhaps a loved one has needed legal counsel in the past and was unable to afford it. In this scenario, your friend might be able to introduce you to the attorney that he or she was able to work with. At the same time, your friend may still have documents with lists of free legal aid attorneys in the area.

If all else fails, check out the Internet. When it comes to legal aid in the city and state of New York, you will find a number of sites that discuss the structure of the programs, who sponsors them, how to qualify for free legal aid and where to make your application. In some cases, you can begin the process online.

Keep in mind that you will not receive legal aids in New York just on your say-so. You will have to prove that you are unable to pay for attorney services and then submit an application. Once you are accepted, then you will be able to meet with an attorney and begin the process of dealing with whatever legal issue you have on your plate.

Related posts:

Source: http://blog.freeny.org/attorney/finding-legal-aids-in-new-york

oyster festival oyster festival hopkins hopkins mlk mlk the big year